\n<\/p>\n
Republican Senators, with<\/span> an assist from Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., voted down an attempt block the Trump administration\u2019s missile strikes on alleged Venezuelan drug boats on Wednesday, hours after a nominee to serve as the CIA\u2019s top lawyer dodged questions from Democrats about the secret legal justification<\/a> for the strikes at his confirmation hearing.<\/p>\n The Senate voted 51-48 against a War Powers Act resolution sponsored by Sens. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Tim Kaine, D-Va. \u2014 the first time members of Congress went on the record about the strikes.<\/p>\n If passed, the resolution would have blocked Donald Trump\u2019s administration from conducting further strikes without congressional approval.<\/p>\n Sen. Rand Paul<\/a> of Kentucky and Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska were the only Republicans <\/strong>to vote in favor of the resolution. Fetterman was the sole Democrat to break with the rest of his caucus, mirroring his vote earlier this year<\/a> for a similar resolution in response to the Trump administration\u2019s strike on Iran. (Fetterman\u2019s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.) Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, did not vote.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is also the policy issue of the risk of the U.S. getting embroiled in another war.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n The vote came days after the fourth confirmed boat strike conducted by the U.S. military. Those strikes, which the administration claims hit boats carrying drugs, have taken the lives of at least 21 people.<\/p>\n Hours before the vote, Colombian President Gustavo Petro said on social media<\/a> that evidence suggested that the fourth boat strike was against a Colombian vessel carrying Colombian citizens.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n While Colombia is a nominal U.S. ally in the war on drugs, the strikes have led to increased tensions <\/a>with Venezuelan President Nicol\u00e1s Maduro, who has pledged to defend his country by force if necessary<\/a> as the U.S. deploys thousands of military personnel in the Caribbean.<\/p>\n Schiff said the strikes raised questions about the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches.<\/p>\n \u201cThere is also the policy issue of the risk of the U.S. getting embroiled in another war,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The Trump administration has not sought congressional approval for the strikes, despite declaring last week that it was at war with drug traffickers. Scholars have said the Trump administration\u2019s legal case for the attacks is baseless<\/a>.<\/p>\n Speaking on the Senate floor, Sen. Jim Risch, R-Idaho, who chairs the Foreign Relations Committee, defended the Trump administration\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n \u201cPeople were attacking our country by bringing in poisonous substances,\u201d he said. \u201cThe people carrying those drugs were terrorists, plain and simple. They were trafficking drugs that finance a designated foreign terrorist organization.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \u201cWe will never know, because they were blown to smithereens.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n His fellow Republican, Paul, said that the terrorist label has been twisted out of recognition.<\/p>\n \u201cThe blow-them-to-smithereens crowd might stop to ponder that a good percentage of the ships that we actually search turn out not to be drug smugglers,\u201d Paul said. \u201cWe will never know, because they were blown to smithereens.\u201d<\/p>\n Ahead of the vote, Schiff and Kaine sought to cast it as an attempt to force the administration to comply with the Constitution in order to win over Republicans who might take a principled vote in favor of checks and balances. That prospect was dashed by the vote, which turned into a nearly party-line affair.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n\n