{"id":2502,"date":"2024-08-29T18:11:31","date_gmt":"2024-08-29T18:11:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/?p=2502"},"modified":"2024-08-29T18:11:31","modified_gmt":"2024-08-29T18:11:31","slug":"north-american-xb-70-valkyrie-americas-cold-war-supersonic-speed-bomber","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/?p=2502","title":{"rendered":"North American XB-70 Valkyrie \u2014 America\u2019s Cold War Supersonic Speed Bomber"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

By Friedrich Seiltgen<\/a><\/p>\n

T<\/span>he North American Aviation XB-70 Valkyrie was a planned supersonic strategic bomber replacement for the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress<\/a> and the Corvair B-58 Hustler. The United States Air Force required a bomber that would fly faster and higher than the B-52 and could also evade interceptor aircraft.<\/p>\n

\n<\/picture>
A right side air-to-air view of the North American XB-70 Valkyrie supersonic bomber during a 1960 test flight.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Valkyrie was designed in the mid-1950s, when speed improved your odds of surviving a mission. However, surface-to-air missile (SAM) technology of the Soviet Union improved and forced a change to bomber tactics to favor low-level penetration. Line-of-sight radar used to detect American planes meant low-flying bombers had a better chance of reaching their targets. The high-flying Valkyrie\u2019s speed would no longer be a decisive factor.<\/p>\n

\"restored\n<\/picture>
Restoration crews wash the North American XB-70 Valkyrie prior to its move to the new fourth building at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force on Oct. 26, 2015. Image:\u00a0Ken LaRock\/U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Research and development costs also doomed the program \u2014 especially when the relatively cheap Intercontinental Ballistic Missile (ICBM) made many people consider that manned strategic bombers were obsolete. Consequently, the U.S. Air Force abandoned the Valkyrie and canceled the seemingly very promising and incredibly advanced program in 1961.\u00a0<\/p>\n

The XB-70 Aircraft Concept<\/h2>\n

In September 1957, the U.S.A.F. issued operational requirements for a new supersonic bomber with:\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u2022 Cruising speed of Mach 3.0 to 3.2\u00a0
\u2022 Over-target altitude of 70,000\u201375,000 feet\u00a0
\u2022 Range of up to 10,500 miles<\/p>\n

In December 1957, North American Aviation was selected as the prime contractor of the new XB-70 bomber. Shortly thereafter, the Air Force held a \u201cName the B-70\u201d contest and received over 20,000 entries. Valkyrie was the winning submission.<\/p>\n

\"North\n<\/picture>
The North American XB-70 cockpit of the remaining aircraft at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force. Image:\u00a0Ken LaRock\/U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

By traveling at Mach 3, at 70,000+ feet, it was believed that the B-70 would be immune to interceptor aircraft. Supersonic interceptors, like the Soviet MiG-19 and MiG-21, were the only weapons effective against the Valkyrie bombers at the beginning of its design.<\/p>\n

\"XB-70\n<\/picture>
The XB-70 bomber in a NASA test flight with the North American X-15 (out of frame). The XB-70 had a top speed in excess of Mach 3. Image:\u00a0U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As the program continued, though, engineers in the Soviet Union made great strides in surface-to-air missile design, which put the Valkyries\u2019 invulnerability in doubt. This was reinforced by the appearance of the Soviet SA-2 \u201cGuideline\u201d (also known as the S-75 Dvina) surface-to-air missile at the 1957 Moscow May Day parade.<\/p>\n

\"North\n<\/picture>
During take-off, the wing tips of the XB-70 were extended straight out to provide a maximum lifting wing surface. Image:\u00a0NARA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In 1957, the Convair division of General Dynamics began work on a defensive missile for the Valkyrie, code-named Pye Wacket. This lenticular design was essentially a saucer-shaped missile with a 55-pound warhead powered by three solid rocket motors that propelled it to a speed of Mach 6.5. While test flights were successful, the Valkyrie cancellation also ended this program.<\/p>\n

\"Pye\n<\/picture>
The saucer-shaped Pye Wacket missile prototype. This missile was intended to be a defensive system for the XB-70 bomber. Image:\u00a0U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Although the bomber program was canceled, the U.S.A.F. ordered two Valkyrie prototypes as test beds to study the propulsion of supersonic flight and the aerodynamic characteristics of large aircraft.<\/p>\n

Big and Brash Strategic Bomber<\/h2>\n

The Valkyrie was a large aircraft with a wingspan of 105 feet, a length of 192 feet 2 inches, a height of 30 feet 9 inches, a forward canard measuring 28 feet 10 inches, and a loaded weight of 534,700 lbs.<\/p>\n

\"North\n<\/picture>
Restoration staff move the North American XB-70 Valkyrie into the new fourth building at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force on Oct. 27, 2015. Image:\u00a0Don Popp\/U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As with all cutting-edge programs, the Valkyrie used some remarkable new technology. Mach 3 travel generates heat reaching an average of 450 degrees, with the leading edges reaching over 600 degrees. These temperatures required titanium use at the nose and vertical stabilizers.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\t\t\t\t\"\"\/<\/p>\n

Live The Armory Life.<\/strong> The latest content straight to your inbox plus an automatic entry to each of our monthly gun\u00a0giveaways!<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Still, the most significant tech was using stainless steel honeycomb panels, which comprised much of Valkyrie\u2019s surface area. This technology was needed to handle the heat and use the shockwave generated by supersonic speeds for \u201ccompression lift.\u201d<\/p>\n

Compression Lift<\/h2>\n

While in supersonic flight, the leading edge of the splitter vane created a shockwave. North American engineers used this shockwave to help create lift for the extremely large plane.<\/p>\n

\"compression\n<\/picture>
As the leading edge of the splitter vane cuts through the air, it creates a shockwave with pressure under the wings that causes additional lift on the XB-70 bomber. Image:\u00a0U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

During flight, the pressure under the wings was 40 psi higher than in front of the wave. The outer portions of the wings could be adjusted downward to almost 65 degrees, which increased stability and provided about 5 percent of the Valkyrie\u2019s lift.<\/p>\n

North American Super-Sized \u201cSix Pack\u201d<\/h2>\n

For the Valkyrie to accomplish its stated mission, it required speed. The XB-70 was equipped with six General Electric YJ93-GE-3 turbojet engines, which were essentially supersized J79 engines used in the F-4 Phantom.<\/p>\n

\"North\n<\/picture>
The North American XB-70 Valkyrie had six General Electric turbojet engines that produced roughly 54,000 pounds of combined thrust. Image:\u00a0Ken LaRock\/U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

These engines produced 19,000 pounds of thrust each in regular operation and 28,000 pounds while in afterburner. With a thrust-to-weight ratio of 5:1, they gave the Valkyrie a speed of 2,056 mph (Mach 3.1) at an altitude of 73,000 feet, with a range of 4,288 miles.<\/p>\n

\"XB-70\n<\/picture>
The XB-70 employed drag chutes to slow down during landings. Note the wing tips are in the extended position to improve handling characteristics at lower speeds. Image:\u00a0U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The engines required a specially formulated JP-6 jet fuel, similar to JP-5 but with a lower freezing point and improved thermal-oxidative stability. The fuel was also used for cooling and circulated through heat exchangers before entering the engines.<\/p>\n

Disaster Strikes the Fastest Bomber<\/h2>\n

On June 8, 1966, Valkyrie number two was flying in formation with four other aircraft, including a McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom<\/a>, a Lockheed F-104 Starfighter<\/a>, a Northrop T-38 Talon and a Northrop YF5 Freedom Fighter. The formation was part of a photo shoot for General Electric, the manufacturer of the engines for all five aircraft.<\/p>\n

\"flight\n<\/picture>
Shown is the ill-fated formation flight centered on the XB-70, flanked by a T-38A, F-4B, the F-104 orange tail and a YF-5A moments before the collision on June 8, 1966. Image:\u00a0NARA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Everything was going fine, and then disaster struck: a mid-air collision. The F-104 Starfighter struck the right wingtip and rolled over the wing of Valkyrie, destroying the vertical stabilizers and damaging the left wing, crippling the Valkyrie. The Starfighter exploded, and the Valkyrie flew straight for several seconds and then became uncontrollable, rolling inverted and descending into the desert near Barstow, California.<\/p>\n

\"XB-70\n<\/picture>
This photo shows XB-70 and escorted by a TB-58 chase plane. Although slower than the XB-70, the TB-58, a modified B-58, was able to keep up by flying lower and using tighter turns. Image:\u00a0U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The pilot of the F-104, Joe Walker, NASA Chief Test Pilot, was killed instantly when his aircraft exploded. Valkyrie co-pilot Carl Cross was also killed, and Valkyrie pilot Al White ejected and was severely injured due to the escape pod system of the Valkyrie, including a crushed arm from the clamshell closing during the ejection sequence.<\/p>\n

The accident investigation claimed that the F-104 pilot was too close. He could not get a proper visual of the Valkyrie wing tip without turning unnaturally over his left shoulder, and the wake from the Valkyrie caused the Starfighter to be pulled into the wing.<\/p>\n

The Last Valkyrie<\/h2>\n

The Valkyrie program provided significant data about aerodynamics, compression lift, propulsion, and other areas. In late 1966, the Valkyrie was used to test the intensity of sonic booms for the proposed U.S. Supersonic Transport program.<\/p>\n

\"last\n<\/picture>
The remaining XB-70 Valkyrie bomber is on display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Data from the program was also used during the development of the Rockwell B-1 Lancer bomber, the U.S. Supersonic Transport (S.S.T.) and was later found in the design of the Tupolev TU-144 SST due to espionage.<\/p>\n

\"XB-70\n<\/picture>
This photo shows the XB-70A parked on a ramp at Edwards Air Force Base in 1967. The XB-70 was the world\u2019s largest experimental aircraft. Image:\u00a0U.S.A.F.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

When the Valkyrie test bed flights ended in 1969, the remaining Valkyrie was flown to its final destination, the National Museum of the United States Air Force at Wright Patterson Air Force Base.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Editor\u2019s Note: Please be sure to check out The Armory Life Forum, where you can comment about our daily articles, as well as just talk guns and gear. Click the \u201cGo To Forum Thread\u201d link below to jump in and discuss this article and much more!<\/em><\/p>\n

Join the Discussion<\/span><\/h5>\n

Go to forum thread<\/a><\/p>\n

Featured in this article<\/span><\/h5>\n

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/span> \n\t\t\t\t\t\"National\n<\/picture>\n <\/p>\n

National Museum of the United States Air Force <\/h3>\n


\n\t\t\t\t<\/a><\/section>\n<\/p><\/div>\n


\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Friedrich Seiltgen The North American Aviation XB-70 Valkyrie was a planned supersonic strategic bomber replacement for the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress and the Corvair B-58 Hustler. The United States Air Force required a bomber that would fly faster and higher than the B-52 and could also evade interceptor aircraft. A right side air-to-air view of […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2503,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2502\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}