{"id":2218,"date":"2024-05-27T21:22:12","date_gmt":"2024-05-27T21:22:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/?p=2218"},"modified":"2024-05-27T21:22:12","modified_gmt":"2024-05-27T21:22:12","slug":"are-guns-bad-investments-the-armory-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/?p=2218","title":{"rendered":"Are Guns Bad Investments? – The Armory Life"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

By Clayton Walker<\/a><\/p>\n

In today\u2019s article, the author explores the idea of investing in guns. This is purely an informational article that considers if guns are a good investment. It is not investment advice. The author\u2019s views are his own and not necessarily those of\u00a0<\/em>The Armory Life. Always consult a qualified financial advisor when examining investment opportunities.<\/em><\/p>\n

I<\/span>t\u2019s likely you\u2019ve seen it before. Someone will post a picture of a dusty ad back from the 1950s or 1960s with a variety of desirable firearms being sold at eye-popping prices. I happened across one of them recently: how would you like to live in a time when you could buy a USGI M1911 for $60? How about a Kar 98k for $30, or a 1903 Springfield rifle for $40?<\/p>\n

\n<\/picture>
This gun advertisement from the 1960s suggests that investing in guns might be a sound financial strategy. But is it really? In this article, the author examines the idea of guns as an investment.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

For a few of us, these ads invite a trip down memory lane. The rest of us are left yearning for a time machine. Supposing we had one, we\u2019d certainly pad our own collections with a variety of some of the best and most enduring firearm designs throughout history. However, laying eyes upon these prices tends to trigger another common \u201cwhat if\u201d scenario: Imagine how much money a person could have made if they\u2019d stocked up and re-sold at today\u2019s prices!<\/p>\n

Of course, there\u2019s a more realistic train of thought to be pursued: we can\u2019t go back in time, but is it a good idea to purchase guns\u00a0today\u00a0<\/em>with the intent of selling them\u00a0later,\u00a0<\/em>specifically as investments or as part of a rainy day fund? Let\u2019s explore what\u2019s tricky \u2014 and potentially troublesome \u2014 about that concept.<\/p>\n

Inflation and Opportunity Costs of Gun Investing<\/h2>\n

I\u2019ll be honest: most of the time when I see internet threads were people are recalling the good ol\u2019 days of being able to buy SKS and Mosin Nagant rifles for the cost of a large pizza, I\u2019m practically shouting \u201cInflation!\u201d at my monitor.<\/p>\n

\"In\n<\/picture>
Surplus M1911A1 pistols are often seen as a good investment. But any high-quality modern firearm, such as the Springfield Mil-Spec 1911<\/a>, can store value over time.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Fundamentally, the United States Dollar is worth less over time. Any person with the literacy skills to read this article has experienced inflation up close and personal in our post-pandemic economy. I don\u2019t need to tell\u00a0you\u00a0<\/em>that the money of 2024 has less purchasing power than it ever did in our nation\u2019s history. A trip to the grocery store can be as instructive as a university macroeconomics course!<\/p>\n

Crunching the numbers, that $40 1903 Springfield being sold in 1966 has an equivalent 2024 price of $390.40. Given that \u201cshooter grade\u201d 1903s are going for about $1,200 today, give or take a few hundred bucks, you would have quadrupled the real value of your money if you\u2019d bought the rifle then and resold it some 58 years later. That sounds pretty good to most of us!<\/p>\n

But let\u2019s suppose you took that same $40 and put it in the S&P 500 index fund, almost universally regarded as a \u201csafe\u201d investment, and one which has historically delivered about a 9% year-over-year return. That same $40 would be worth $5,926 today.<\/p>\n

\"This\n<\/picture>
Even accounting for inflation, these U.S. GI 1911A1 pistols were screaming deals. Over the years there have been a variety of surplus firearms that have appreciated in value.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

For yuks, I also crunched a few numbers when it comes to investing in yourself. Cross-comparing info from the Education Data Initiative and the US Department of Commerce, the average cost of one year\u2019s college tuition in 1966 was $302, and college graduates of 1966 tended to earn about $200,000 more than their high-school educated counterparts over the course of a lifetime. In plainer terms: if you went back to 1966 and spent the equivalent of a Springfield 1903 on your intellectual advancement, it would translate to about $6,700 in lifetime earnings.<\/p>\n

My point is that in terms of actually measuring what most of us would consider\u00a0legitimate, unquestionable<\/em>\u00a0investments, the performance of firearms falls a little short.<\/p>\n

Gun Investments \u2014 Hindsight and Logistics<\/h2>\n

You\u2019ll notice that so far, I didn\u2019t mention investing in Google or Microsoft. If you put $40 into either IPO, and accounting for stock splits, those investments today would be worth about $2,800 and $235,000, respectively. According to this gunwriter\u2019s back-of-envelope calculations, anyway. Naturally, hindsight is 20\/20, and logically we know that not every stock is going to deliver eye-popping returns.<\/p>\n

\"Springfield\n<\/picture>
Military surplus rifles, like this Springfield Armory made Krag-J\u00f8rgensen Model 1898, tend to appreciate over time. Things like condition, rarity and popularity all influence value.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Now let\u2019s apply that same logic to firearms. Congratulations to those who had the good horse sense to grab a semi-auto French FAMAS rifle imported in the late \u201980s, or anyone who inherited a .44 Dragoon revolver from a Great Grandpappy who served in the U.S. Cavalry. Those firearms move for\u00a0gonzo<\/em>\u00a0bucks these days.<\/p>\n

However, there are far more vintage and antique firearms that are not worth very much to anyone. Head down to your nearest large gun store right now: I guarantee you will be able to find at least one .32 \u201ctop break\u201d style revolver \u2014 of late 19th<\/sup>\u00a0century vintage \u2014 for less than a couple of C-notes. Yes, they\u2019re old, but they don\u2019t resonate in the American psyche nor have much to recommend them as functional shooters. Often, new generations are absolutely gobsmacked to find them in an attic or long-forgotten toolbox, thinking they\u2019re worth their weight in gold. The excitement fades when they have them appraised.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\t\t\t\t\"\"\/<\/p>\n

Live The Armory Life.<\/strong> The latest content straight to your inbox plus an automatic entry to each of our monthly gun\u00a0giveaways!<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Beyond that, consider the logistics of storage and selling. Condition matters! If you\u2019re going to hold onto a gun long-term for later re-sale, are you monitoring for humidity and keeping it free of scratches, dings, and dents? Additionally, who do you imagine is going to buy at your asking price? My local gun store had a very desirable handgun in the case marked at $8,000 \u2014 a fair price, admittedly. Problem was, just about no-walk ins were prepared to drop that kind of coin. As a result, it went to a local auction house for sale \u2014 who of course took a cut of the hammer price for their trouble.<\/p>\n

I would also add that the federal government takes a dim view of regular people \u201cengaged in the business of firearms\u201d without an FFL. Naturally, one would be well-advised to go straight to the source on this, and the ATF has a good primer at\u00a0www.atf.gov\/file\/100871\/download<\/a><\/strong>. I can offer a brief and partial summary here, though it comes with the caveat that I am not a lawyer and am not offering legal advice.<\/p>\n

\"Shown\n<\/picture>
Authentic Single Action Army revolvers are quite popular with gun collectors. Even so, condition matters a great deal when determining an asking price. Protect your guns from damage and corrosion.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

According to the ATF\u2019s own language, \u201coccasional sales\u201d are fine; a self-proclaimed investor repeatedly acquiring and selling guns for the explicit purpose of earning a profit is not. Intent matters with respect to determining whether a firearm is part of what the federal government considers a \u201cpersonal collection.\u201d Additionally, you are certainly allowed to make a profit from what you sell out of your personal collection, but a firearm cannot and should not be purchased\u00a0only\u00a0<\/em>as a potential moneymaker.\u00a0<\/p>\n

As such, the idea of using guns as the foundation of a legitimate wealth-building strategy becomes logistically very difficult, and it would require one to obtain a Federal Firearms License if they nevertheless wished to make the effort.<\/p>\n

[Ed. note: Gun laws change and the BATFE is known to change its interpretation of existing laws when it comes to deciding what to enforce and how. Consult an attorney prior to engaging in the purchase and resale of any firearm for profit.]<\/em><\/p>\n

The Other Way To Think About Investing in Guns<\/h2>\n

What I typically tell people is this: guns may not be good investments, but the firearms in your personal collection can be\u00a0excellent stores of value<\/em>. Unlike the laptop on which I am typing this article, or the car parked in your garage, it is doubtful your firearms will be worthless, broken junk in 15 years. Much to the contrary, they will very likely be worth a good chunk of money several decades later if they remain in good, shootable condition.<\/p>\n

\"Shown\n<\/picture>
A pistol like the Springfield XD can be an excellent store of value. It is a practical defensive firearm that is likely to maintain its value indefinitely.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As such, guns that are both desirable and financially attainable are often very \u201cliquid\u201d as far as durable goods go. Some may not think of a 9mm Springfield XD<\/a> the same way they might a bar of silver or Rolex watch, but I guarantee you that someone will always be interested in a \u201cduty\u201d type pistol in a common caliber. Certainly, my local shops found themselves utterly cleaned out of literally\u00a0any<\/em>\u00a09mm pistol at the height of the pandemic.<\/p>\n

Additionally, solid, proven designs with more than a decade of performance history will always be \u201cknown quantities\u201d with inherent worth to a large contingent of buyers. Since I was in college \u2014 a good two decades past, mind you \u2014 the Springfield TRP<\/a> has been highly desirable and consistently sells at a high price on the secondary market.<\/p>\n

I have also found that most of the firearms in my own collection have kept pace with the effects of inflation over time. Again, they haven\u2019t \u201cappreciated\u201d in real terms that would ever get close to beating the stock market, but the worth of my own collection has grown faster than the portion of my money sitting in a savings account at a half-percent interest rate.<\/p>\n

\"In\n<\/picture>
This 1965 advertisement offered Canadian surplus M1 Carbines for $60. Additional magazines cost only $1 each.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

All that said, here\u2019s the more fun way to look at things. Suppose you find yourself drooling over one of Springfield Armory\u2019s vaunted \u201cProfessional\u201d models. That $3,600 price tag is certainly not small potatoes. But, if you told yourself you were going to sell it at the end of three years, and putting inflation aside, I think it\u2019s utterly reasonable to get at least 85% of that gun\u2019s value back on the secondary market \u2014 a little more than $3,000.<\/p>\n

This raises an interesting question: would you \u201clease\u201d the gun of your dreams for a net cost of $600, especially knowing you could end the terms of that lease whenever you wanted to? I think a lot of people would answer \u201cyes\u201d to that question.<\/p>\n

Additionally, we can talk about a lot of firearm purchases in the same way we talk about \u201cstarter homes.\u201d That is, they might not be something you\u2019ll still have in 30 years, but can be a real asset that helps you bridge the financial gap to the gun with the build quality and feature set you\u00a0really<\/em>\u00a0want. The rough-but-honest example of a German K98k in your collection today can be used to partially fund a Model 2020 Waypoint tomorrow.<\/p>\n

In short, firearms might not be investments in the conventional sense of the term, but nearly every quality firearm has monetary value. In the beginning, many of us looked to our rainy day funds as the primary means of adding to our collection. I would posit that a great number of experienced shooters and firearms connoisseurs will view each firearm collection as a rainy day fund in itself.<\/p>\n

Editor\u2019s Note: Please be sure to check out The Armory Life Forum, where you can comment about our daily articles, as well as just talk guns and gear. Click the \u201cGo To Forum Thread\u201d link below to jump in and discuss this article and much more!<\/em><\/p>\n

Join the Discussion<\/span><\/h5>\n

Go to forum thread<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n


\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Clayton Walker In today\u2019s article, the author explores the idea of investing in guns. This is purely an informational article that considers if guns are a good investment. It is not investment advice. The author\u2019s views are his own and not necessarily those of\u00a0The Armory Life. Always consult a qualified financial advisor when examining […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2219,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2218","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2218","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2218"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2218\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2219"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2218"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2218"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2218"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}