{"id":1619,"date":"2023-11-11T20:09:39","date_gmt":"2023-11-11T20:09:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/?p=1619"},"modified":"2023-11-11T20:09:39","modified_gmt":"2023-11-11T20:09:39","slug":"douglas-sbd-dauntless-americas-carrier-killer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/?p=1619","title":{"rendered":"Douglas SBD Dauntless: America\u2019s Carrier Killer"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/p>\n

\n

By Peter Suciu<\/a><\/p>\n

T<\/span>here were many military platforms in history that have been described as the \u201cright tool\u201d for the job. The Douglas SBD Dauntless dive-bomber arguably was not exactly one of those. It was underpowered and vulnerable, and it lacked range. Pilots said it was exhausting to fly for any length of time, and it was already showing its age even as the war in the Pacific was beginning.<\/p>\n

\n<\/picture>
A pair of Douglas SBD-5 bombers fly past their carrier in November 1943. The photo was taken by a Naval Air Station Weeksville airship. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Yet, the contributions of the venerable Dauntless to victory in a succession of key naval battles cannot be overstated \u2014 while its tally of Japanese shipping during the Second World War was simply unmatched. The dive-bomber accounted for half of all U.S. carrier aircraft in the first year of the war, and the SBD was central to the U.S. Navy\u2019s successes at the Battles of Coral Sea, Midway and the Solomons.<\/p>\n

\"douglas\n<\/picture>
Nine Douglas SBD-2 Dauntless scout bombers, of Scouting Squadron Six (VS-6) fly in formation. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Dauntless was arguably an example of making do with the tools on hand \u2014 and it is a testament to the U.S. Navy and USMC aviators who flew the warbird.<\/p>\n

SBD Dauntless \u2014 Old on Arrival?<\/h2>\n

With more than eight decades of hindsight it is easy to see the Douglas SBD Dauntless as antiquated \u2014 but also why even then it was often known as \u201cSlow But Deadly.\u201d Yet, it was also developed during a time of great innovation and massive leaps forward. In actuality, the SBD was as much revolutionary as it was evolutionary.<\/p>\n

\"douglas\n<\/picture>
Douglas SBD-2 Dauntless scout bomber In flight over the Pacific in mid-1941. This is the USS\u00a0Enterprise<\/em>\u00a0(CV-6) Air Group Commander\u2019s aircraft, wearing a light grey color scheme. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The aircraft owed its origin to the low-wing, two-seat tandem Northrop BT-1 dive-bomber that was envisioned by Jack Northrop in the mid-1930s. However, when the El Segundo, California manufacturer became a division of Douglas with Northrop\u2019s departure, the BT-1\u2019s development was taken over by Edward H. Heinemann, another notable airplane visionary.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"douglas\n<\/picture>
Wright R-1820 engines on the SBD production line at the Douglas aircraft plant in El Segundo, Calif., August 1943. Image:\u00a0Lt. Charles F. Jacobs\/U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The design was reworked, and the ensuing aircraft featured perforated split flaps and main gears folding backward into large fairings. Both fin and tailplane employed stressed-skin construction, while elevators and rudders were fabric covered. Tabs were further provided on the control surfaces of the tail.<\/p>\n

\"loading\n<\/picture>
Ordnancemen of load a 500-pound bomb on an SBD scout bomber on the flight deck of USS\u00a0Enterprise<\/em>\u00a0(CV-6) during the first day of strikes on Guadalcanal and Tulagi, August 7, 1942. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The result was hardly the most modern of aircraft, even in the late 1930s, but the SBD \u2014 which was accepted by the U.S. Navy even as parallel work was underway on the Curtiss SB2C Helldiver \u2014 became the standard by which all other carrier-borne dive bombers (\u201cscout bombers\u201d in the Navy jargon of the era), were to be judged.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"douglas\n<\/picture>
A Douglas SBD Dauntless Scout-Bomber aircraft In flight, circa 1943-1944. Image:\u00a0U.S. Naval History and Heritage Command collection<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The original SBD-1 was powered by the R-1820-32 Cyclone engine that developed 746kW (1,000 hp) on take-off. An intake atop the engine cowling provided carburetor cooling air. Pilots were provided with a three-power telescopic sight that protruded through the windscreen, and it could be employed for both gun- and bomb-aiming.<\/p>\n

\"douglas\n<\/picture>
Douglas SBD-2 Dauntless scout bombers From Scouting Squadron Six (VS-6), based aboard USS\u00a0Enterprise<\/em>\u00a0(CV-6), in flight over the Pacific in late 1941. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Underwing pylons could carry 45kg (100 pounds) bombs, while the main store was carried under the aircraft\u2019s center section. It had a maximum weight of 725kg (1,600 pounds). On dive-bombing missions, the pilot approached the target at 15,000 to 20,000 feet (4,570 to 6,095 meters), took position almost overhead, flew into a deep dive and then pulled up the nose, deploying the upper and lower dive flaps where it \u201crolled in\u201d with the aircraft essentially aiming the bomb load by literally pointing the plane at the target.<\/p>\n

\"radio\n<\/picture>
Lt. j.g. W. L. McVay (L) watches ARM2C K. W. Jobe check the dual .30-caliber machine guns in their Douglas SBD-3 during Operation Torch aboard USS\u00a0Ranger<\/em>\u00a0(CV-4). Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

That could, and often did result in \u201ctarget fascination\u201d where the pilot could be lulled into such a state that he failed to pull out of the dive in time. However, experienced pilots could make it look almost easy with just the right motion on the stick. The destruction of multiple Japanese aircraft carriers and dozens of other ships is certainly proof that the SBD Dauntless could accomplish its primary mission.<\/p>\n

Scout Bomber, Upgraded and Improved<\/h2>\n

As the development of the aircraft was being completed, Douglas won orders from both the United States Marine Corps and the United States Navy. The Dauntless went into production in June 1940, and the first SBD-1s were delivered to the United States Marine Corps within just months. The initial aircraft, which was not cleared for carrier operations, was armed with two forward-facing .50 caliber machine guns in the engine cowling and a single .30 caliber machine gun for the radio operator\/gunner who sat with his back to the pilot.<\/p>\n

\"navy\n<\/picture>
Five SBD\u2019s from a Navy carrier peel off for a strafing attack on a Japanese radio station on Ulalu Island, Truk Atoll, in the strike of April 29-30, 1944. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The U.S. Navy received the SBD-2, which differed in having self-sealing, rubber-lined, metal fuel tanks and two additional 65-gallon (246 liters) tanks in the outwing panels. The first of the U.S. Navy\u2019s aircraft was delivered beginning in December 1940. The version was also the first to be equipped with automatic piloting according to\u00a0Jane\u2019s Fighting Aircraft of World War II<\/em>\u00a0(Jane\u2019s Publishing Company 1946\/47).<\/p>\n

\"sailors\n<\/picture>
On the USS\u00a0Ranger<\/em>\u00a0(CV-4), sailors mount a 1000-pound bomb on a SBD-3 during Operation Torch in November 1942. Canvas duck covers are in use on the carrier\u2019s 5\u2033 gun on the left. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

It is noteworthy that actions not in the Pacific but in Europe factored into the evolution of the Dauntless. Washington witnessed with great shock how Germany\u2019s Ju-88 Stuka dive-bombers were employed to great effect, and that spurred the U.S. Navy to increase its order but also to improve the capabilities of the SBD.<\/p>\n

\"sbd-5\n<\/picture>
A Douglas SBD-5 on the flight deck of USS\u00a0Yorktown<\/em>\u00a0(CV-10) awaits the take-off signal during a raid on a Japanese base, 1 September \u2014 6 October 1943. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The SBD-3 was equipped with a more powerful Wright R-1820-52 engine, while it featured aluminum fuel tanks and self-sealing liners. It had essentially the same armament, but with a pair of .30-caliber machine guns for the gunner, along with additional armor protection and a \u201cbullet-proof\u201d windscreen, according to Jane\u2019s. It became the standard carrier-borne dive bomber with the United States Navy by December 1941, and for two years it fulfilled the entire \u201cscout dive-bomber\u201d requirement for naval operations in the Pacific.<\/p>\n

\"sbd-5\n<\/picture>
Douglas SBD-5 bombers on USS\u00a0Lexington<\/em>\u2018s (CV-16) flight deck after returning from raids on Gilbert Islands targets, 18 September 1943. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The subsequent SBD-4, SBD-5 and SBD-6 variants saw additional improvements, with the latter two models being equipped with slightly more powerful engines. These models entered service just as the Dauntless was being superseded by more modern and capable aircraft.<\/p>\n

Douglas Dive Bomber Turns the Tide<\/h2>\n

As employed aboard the U.S. Navy aircraft carriers during the war, the SBD Dauntless was generally assigned to one bombing squadron (VB designation) and one scout squadron (VS), which formed the overall air wing that also included two squadrons of fighters and one of torpedo bombers. In practice, however, both the VB and VS units shared similar tasks.<\/p>\n

\"sbd\n<\/picture>
Navy dive bombers during the attack on the Japanese fleet off Midway, June 1942. In the center is visible a burning Japanese ship. Image:\u00a0NARA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

At the Battle of Coral Sea in May 1942, SBD-2 and SBD-3 models from USS\u00a0Yorktown<\/em>\u00a0(CV-5) combined with Douglas TBD-1 Devastator torpedo-bombers, succeeded in sinking the Imperial Japanese Navy\u2019s aircraft carrier\u00a0Sh\u014dh\u014d\u00a0<\/em>after a 30-minute-long engagement, with the loss of just three U.S. aircraft.<\/p>\n

\"sbd\n<\/picture>
SBD dive bombers from the USS\u00a0Lexington<\/em>\u00a0(CV-16), an\u00a0Essex<\/em>-class carrier, attack Wake Island on October 5, 1943. Wake Island was lost to Japan in December 1941. Image:\u00a0NARA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

During the subsequent Battle of Midway in June 1942, the Dauntless played a pivotal role \u2014 when a force of 128 of the aging warbirds launched from the decks of the American carrier groups. They sought to find the carriers of Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, and it could have ended in disaster. As darkness approached and the SBDs were approaching their endurance limits, the IJN\u2019s fleet was discovered.<\/p>\n

\"sbd\n<\/picture>
In November 1942, SBD bombers fly by burning Japanese transports at Guadalcanal. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Though 40 of the dive-bombers were lost, the survivors \u2014 each armed with a single 1,000-pound (454 kg) armor-piercing bomb \u2014 pressed home the attacks on the carriers\u00a0Kaga<\/em>,\u00a0Akagi<\/em>, and\u00a0S\u014dry\u016b<\/em>. The three were set ablaze in the space of just three minutes, while a fourth carrier,\u00a0Hiry\u016b<\/em>, was sunk in a subsequent wave.<\/p>\n

\n
\n\t\t\t\t\"\"\/<\/p>\n

Live The Armory Life.<\/strong> The latest content straight to your inbox plus an automatic entry to each of our monthly gun\u00a0giveaways!<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

That turned the tide of the war in the Pacific.<\/p>\n

In addition to its success as a dive-bomber, one Navy SBD crew managed to shoot down seven Japanese A6M \u201cZero\u201d fighters in the space of just two days.<\/p>\n

\"sbd\n<\/picture>
A Japanese heavy cruiser is attacked by an SBD dive bomber from the USS\u00a0Saratoga<\/em>\u00a0(CV-3). The photo was taken from the plane\u2019s gun camera during the raid on Rabaul, November 1943. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Even as more capable U.S. aircraft entered service \u2014 notably the Curtiss SB2C Helldiver \u2014 the SBD Dauntless was employed in combat at Rabaul, Guadalcanal and the Solomons, and Truk. The Helldiver never proved as successful as the SBD, yet once it was on the scene, the Dauntless was largely relegated to anti-submarine patrol and close air support duties.<\/p>\n

Other Operators of the SBD<\/h2>\n

While the aircraft was most infamous in its U.S. Navy role during World War II, a total of 20 United States Marine Corps squadrons also flew the Dauntless. In addition, it was also operated by the United States Army Air Forces as the A-24 Banshee, and the dive-bomber saw service with the 27th Bombardment Group at New Guinea and with the 531st Fighter Bomber Squadron at Makin.<\/p>\n

\"usmc\n<\/picture>
A U.S. Marine Corps SBD Dauntless flying to drop its bombs on Vunakanau, Airdrome at Rabaul. Image:\u00a0Sgt. W. G. Brunk\/USMC<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

However, USAAF pilots often found that they could not outmaneuver aggressive Japanese fighters. Where the rear-seat gunner had been highly effective with U.S. Navy aviators, the Army Air Force had far less success. In fact, casualties of the A-24 Banshee were so high that it was quickly withdrawn from front-line service.<\/p>\n

\"sbd\n<\/picture>
Douglas SBD scout planes from the USS\u00a0Ranger<\/em>\u00a0(CV-4) fly anti-submarine patrol over the Operation Torch invasion convoy in the Mediterranean Sea, November 1942. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The UK acquired nine aircraft for testing, but perhaps based on the performance with the USAAF, it ultimately rejected it for service. By contrast, the Royal New Zealand Air Force employed a number of SBD-3, SBD-4 and SBD-5 models from U.S. Navy and USMC stocks. Those aircraft saw action at Bougainville with great success.<\/p>\n

\"sbd-3\n<\/picture>
A Douglas SBD-3 Dauntless radioman-gunner test fires his twin .30 caliber machine guns. The yellow circle around the national insignia indicates that this was taken during Operation Torch. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The French military also employed A-24s and SBD-3s at Agadir, Morocco, and later in metropolitan France against retreating German forces in 1944. France continued to operate the dive-bomber after the war, while it also saw service in the air forces of Chile, Mexico and Morocco. The final Dauntless dive-bombers remained in service with the Mexican Air Force until 1959.<\/p>\n

How Few Dauntless Dive Bombers Remain<\/h2>\n

Though in total 5,936 were produced in all configurations between 1940 and 1944, today, there are only around half a dozen A-24s and SBDs that remain airworthy. An additional 20 or so aircraft are now on display in museums in the United States.<\/p>\n

\"restored\n<\/picture>
Left side view of a Douglas SBD Dauntless aircraft on the flight line at McCarren Airport in Las Vegas, Nevada. Photo was taken during the Gathering of Eagles convention in 1986. Image:\u00a0NARA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

An SBD-2 that is a \u201cveteran\u201d of the Pearl Harbor attack and the Battle of Midway is in the collection of the National Naval Aviation Museum at Naval Air Station Pensacola, Florida. Another SBD-2 is in the Pearl Harbor Aviation Museum at Ford Island, Hawaii, while an SBD-3 is in the collection of the Air Zoo in Kalamazoo, Michigan, and one is also on display at the National World War II Museum in New Orleans, Louisiana.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"flight\n<\/picture>
Douglas SBD-5 Dauntless scout bombers fly in formation over the Caribbean Sea, circa 1944-1945. Image:\u00a0U.S. Navy<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Today, the SBD is best remembered as the dive-bomber that delivered the fatal blows to the Japanese carriers and truly helped turn the tide of the war.<\/p>\n

Editor\u2019s Note: Please be sure to check out The Armory Life Forum, where you can comment about our daily articles, as well as just talk guns and gear. Click the \u201cGo To Forum Thread\u201d link below to jump in and discuss this article and much more!<\/em><\/p>\n

Join the Discussion<\/span><\/h5>\n

Go to forum thread<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n


\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Peter Suciu There were many military platforms in history that have been described as the \u201cright tool\u201d for the job. The Douglas SBD Dauntless dive-bomber arguably was not exactly one of those. It was underpowered and vulnerable, and it lacked range. Pilots said it was exhausting to fly for any length of time, and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1620,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1619\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/1620"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/gunowner-news.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}